Even the most obvious position is effective when it is executed consistently and repetitively in all marketing communications. It should be the theme for everything you do in marketing. Yet a compelling position stated once or twice on your website doesn’t move the needle in your effort to claim a position.
If you need to be convinced that differentiation is critical to effective marketing, or you’re convinced but don’t know how to do it, read on.
The claim you make in your positioning statement needs to be substantiated otherwise it is a meaningless claim. Of course a claim that has no basis in fact is impossible to prove, as evidenced by three vendors who sell financial reporting and consolidations software, a market Gartner now calls “Cloud Financial Corporate Performance Management Solutions.”
If your marketing department is like most, there’s not enough time in the day to do everything on the “todo” list. One reason for this inefficiency is that a lot of time is devoted to figuring out what to say every time you initiate a marketing campaign or activity.
At first blush Oracle appears to be doing a fine job of executing the position that it has “more enterprise cloud applications than anyone.” It is the theme for a currently-running TV ad campaign, and when Oracle president Mark Hurd was asked by CNBC Thursday what sets Oracle apart of the competition, Hurd responded that we have “more enterprise cloud applications than anyone.”
Imagine a new marketing campaign in which you focused your efforts on ensuring creative execution of your message strategy rather than spending time figuring out what to say, and then even more time explaining what you want the writer to write.
The “silo effect” is when each marketing collateral piece seems to be envisioned and created in isolation. There is no continuity and consistency in the message to the market. Every marketing piece is a one-off which is no way to do positioning.
Many Business Intelligence (BI) software marketers would be well served to read “Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind.” Most are doing exactly what Ries and Trout identified as a problem way back in 1981 when the book was first published:
Once you have found the ideal positioning for your company or offering, you should stick with it for an extended period – at least 18 months and the longer the better – several years; perhaps forever. That’s because consistency and repetition are the keys to claiming a position in your market and giving it staying power.
Based on the results from the survey I’m conducting, B2B software and technology marketers desperately need a realistic way to self-assess their positioning effectiveness. That’s because 69% of respondents (137) think they are doing a good job of positioning, but the evidence suggests many are kidding themselves.
The evidence gathered from the survey I’m conducting indicates that B2B marketing professionals are struggling to position effectively. But that’s not the way they see it. Of the 136 respondents so far, 12 percent say their positioning is “very effective” and 56 percent say it is “effective.”
Seventy percent of the respondents to the survey I am conducting say positioning is the most important aspect of marketing, yet only seven out of 132 respondents learned how to do positioning in college. It makes me wonder whether college marketing departments are in touch with the real world.
There are three reasons many B2B software and technology companies fail to claim a position in their market:
Many B2B software and technologies companies don’t think positioning is important enough to take the time to do it effectively. That’s my take on the results of a survey about positioning I conducted last year. You can participate in the 2016 survey by clicking on this link. I’ll be publishing results in future blogs as trends become apparent.
You need a strong foundation to effectively market your B2B software or technology product. That foundation is your message strategy. Everything you do in marketing should be built upon it.
If you’re looking for examples of the most common positioning mistakes in B2B software marketing, check out the eleven vendors who offer claims, billing and policy administration software for the insurance industry. Only two companies – EIS Group and Guidewire – are doing positioning right with asterisks. I’ll explain later in this competitive positioning assessment.
Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!
I don’t think B2B technology marketers have any idea what a true transformation is. Transformation means to change from one form to another. Caitlyn Jenner is a good example of a transformation. With Caitlyn in mind, how many businesses turn into something totally different? One in one hundred, maybe. And how many B2B software companies are truly changing the way their customers do business? None.
I make a living helping B2B software companies position effectively, but I recently sent an e-mail to a prospect telling him to hire a good writer rather than me. While the prospect’s position wasn’t very compelling, the writing was terrible. The prospect needed a quick fix, not a several month positioning project. I felt a good writer would give the prospect time to do positioning right.
In less than a year, eight vendors in the Business Intelligence (BI) market have changed their position, and only Qlik and Panorama took steps in the right direction. Everyone else including SAP, IBM, MicroStrategy, Microsoft and SAS back peddled in their effort to claim a position in the BI market.